Who Used Central Ohio's Cameras for 15,000 Immigration Searches?
Columbus owes the public answers about its Flock network. Plus: Trump’s election address, rewritten Black history, media consolidation and Ohio’s Haitian TPS deadline.
OFF THE TOP
They always sell surveillance with the same promise.
This will make you safer.
This will help police find the stolen car.
This will help bring the missing child home.
This will give investigators another tool.
And sometimes, the tool does exactly that.
But here is the part government does not put on the billboard:
Every surveillance system built for one purpose can eventually be used for another.
The camera installed to search for a robbery suspect can track the vehicle of an immigrant family.
The database created to find a stolen car can reveal where somebody went to church, where they slept, where they worked and which neighborhood they entered.
The local system can become part of a statewide network.
The statewide network can become accessible to an outside agency.
And suddenly, a city that says it is welcoming immigrants has built infrastructure that may help somebody else find them.
That is the accountability problem now confronting Columbus.
An audit identified approximately 15,000 immigration-related searches involving Columbus’ Flock Safety license-plate-reader system. Mayor Andrew Ginther responded by ordering Columbus police to stop sharing the city’s Flock data across the statewide network. City Council’s Public Safety and Criminal Justice Committee has scheduled an August 10 public hearing to examine the system and the audit.
That is movement.
It is not yet accountability.
Because we still do not know who conducted the searches.
We do not know which agencies received the information.
We do not know how many Columbus residents were tracked.
We do not know whether any search contributed to an immigration stop, workplace raid, detention or deportation.
We do not know whether the searches violated city policy.
And we do not know what happens to anyone who used the system improperly.
A hearing is where those questions should begin.
It cannot be where they end.
THE LEAD
Columbus’ Flock Audit Raises a Basic Question: Who Was Watching Whom?
Columbus will hold a special public hearing on August 10 to examine the police division’s use of Flock Safety automated license-plate readers.
The announcement follows an audit that found the Columbus network had been searched approximately 15,000 times for immigration-related purposes. Ginther then directed the police division to stop sharing the city’s data through the broader statewide Flock network.
Council Member Emmanuel Remy, who requested the audit and chairs the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Committee, said the hearing would center transparency and accountability.
Good.
Now the city has to show its work.
What Flock cameras actually collect
Flock devices are automated license-plate readers. They photograph passing vehicles and create searchable records that can include the plate number, vehicle type, color, identifying features, location and time.
Unlike a red-light camera, the system is not primarily designed to issue traffic tickets.
It is designed to create investigative data.
Police can search the system for a specific license plate. They may also search by vehicle description or receive alerts when a vehicle associated with a law-enforcement list passes a camera.
The power of the system is not merely that one camera photographs one vehicle.
The power is that cameras and databases can be connected.
That creates the ability to reconstruct movement across streets, neighborhoods, cities and jurisdictions.
Axios reported that a third-party camera-mapping project estimates nearly 600 Flock and related cameras operate across Franklin County.
That scale changes the question.
This is no longer about a camera at one intersection.
It is about a regional movement database.
“Immigration-related” is not specific enough
The audit finding is alarming, but the phrase immigration-related searches is too broad to serve as the final explanation.
Were the searches conducted by Columbus police?
Were they conducted by another Ohio agency using shared access?
Were federal immigration agents involved?
Were investigators searching for a person accused of a serious crime?
Were they looking for somebody based only on suspected immigration status?
Did the searches involve human trafficking, smuggling or another criminal investigation?
Did they involve civil immigration enforcement?
Were any searches approved automatically through another agency’s request?
Those distinctions matter.
Not because some forms of surveillance should escape scrutiny.
They matter because the public cannot judge legality, necessity or proportionality without knowing the purpose, requester and result of each category of search.
The city should not release private information about innocent residents.
But it can release aggregated records showing:
Which agencies initiated the searches.
How many searches each agency conducted.
What purpose codes were entered.
Whether a warrant, court order or active criminal case existed.
How many searches returned a result.
How many led to a stop, arrest or recovery.
Whether any led to immigration detention or deportation.
How many searches violated policy.
Whether access was suspended or disciplined.
Without those records, “15,000 searches” becomes a number large enough to create fear but too vague to produce accountability.
The public-safety argument deserves receipts too
Police departments routinely defend license-plate readers as tools for locating stolen vehicles, finding missing people and generating investigative leads.
Those are legitimate public-safety interests.
But public officials should not answer civil-liberties concerns with anecdotes alone.
Columbus should document how effective its system has been.
How many crimes were materially solved because of Flock data?
How many stolen vehicles were recovered?
How many missing or endangered people were located?
How many alerts were wrong?
How many innocent drivers were stopped because of an inaccurate or outdated match?
How much has the city paid Flock Safety?
How much staff time is required to operate and audit it?
Does the system produce benefits that could not be achieved with narrower, warrant-based searches?
A government tool should not be judged only by whether it has ever helped.
It should be judged by whether its measurable benefits justify its total cost—including the privacy cost.
Black communities know what “temporary” surveillance becomes
Black America has heard this story before.
The expanded power is introduced for an emergency.
The database is built for the most serious cases.
The camera is placed where officials say crime is highest.
The access is supposed to be limited.
Then the emergency ends, the infrastructure remains and the circle of authorized users expands.
Black neighborhoods have historically experienced heavier police presence, more investigative scrutiny and less political power over how surveillance systems are deployed.
That does not prove every Columbus camera is concentrated in a Black neighborhood.
It means the city has an obligation to release the map so the public can examine the pattern.
Where are the cameras?
Which neighborhoods are most heavily covered?
Were residents consulted?
Are cameras placed according to crime data, political requests, traffic patterns or vendor recommendations?
Does coverage follow violence—or does it follow race and poverty?
We should not have to guess.
Now here’s the read
The question before Columbus is not whether technology can help police.
It can.
The question is whether the city can use powerful technology without surrendering democratic control over it.
Stopping statewide data sharing was a necessary first response.
Scheduling a hearing was a necessary second response.
The third response must be policy.
Columbus needs enforceable rules governing:
Who may access the database.
What justification must be documented.
When a warrant is required.
Whether civil immigration enforcement is prohibited.
How long vehicle data may be retained.
Which external agencies may submit requests.
How residents are notified after misuse.
How often independent audits occur.
Which records must be published.
What penalties apply when policy is violated.
Transparency without enforceable limits is just a clearer view of the same power.
The move
Before the August 10 hearing, Kin Nation should demand the following records:
The complete Flock audit.
The city’s contract with Flock Safety.
The data-sharing agreement and agency-access list.
The system’s search and access policies.
An aggregated breakdown of the 15,000 searches.
A map of city-owned cameras.
Data-retention and deletion rules.
Documented case outcomes attributed to the system.
Any disciplinary findings or access suspensions.
Proposed legislation—not merely promises—for governing future use.
The city already knows how many searches occurred.
Now the public deserves to know who was searching, why they were searching and what happened next.
THE DAILY FIVE
Trump Takes Election Claims to Primetime Tonight
The Occupant of the White House Donald Trump is scheduled to deliver a national address at 9 p.m. Eastern focused on elections, voting systems and what the White House calls “free and fair elections.”
Reuters reports that officials have considered releasing intelligence connected to alleged Chinese attempts or capabilities to interfere with the 2020 election. The available reporting has not established that any such activity altered votes or changed the result. Trump is also pressing for stricter citizenship-document and identification rules as Republicans prepare for the November midterms.
Why Kin Nation should care: Unsupported claims about widespread fraud do not remain confined to speeches. They can become the justification for citizenship-document requirements, voter-roll challenges, restrictions on mail voting and greater federal pressure on state and local election officials.
The Kin+ read: Do not listen only for what Trump says happened in 2020.
Listen for what he says the government should do in 2026.
The allegation is the headline.
The requested power is the story.
The Federal Government Rewrote a Slavery Exhibit at George Washington’s Philadelphia Home
The Trump administration replaced exhibit panels at the President’s House site in Philadelphia, where George Washington lived with nine enslaved people while serving as president.
The original exhibition centered the lives and experiences of the people Washington enslaved. The revised panels continue to acknowledge slavery, but Philadelphia officials and historical advocates say the new presentation shifts attention toward Washington and softens the violence and coercion at the center of enslavement. Federal officials say the revisions provide fuller historical context.
The panels were installed after a federal appeals ruling allowed the administration to proceed despite Philadelphia’s legal challenge.
Why Kin Nation should care: This is not a fight over vocabulary at one tourist site.
It is a fight over who has the authority to define the American story.
The Kin+ read: The federal government did not erase every reference to slavery.
It did something more subtle.
It changed the center of gravity.
And when the people who endured slavery are pushed toward the margins of an exhibit built around their lives, the institution is not merely revising history.
It is redistributing public sympathy.
Trump Is Preparing Another Election Legitimacy Fight
President Donald Trump is expected to deliver a national address Thursday night about newly declassified intelligence connected to the 2020 election and what the White House describes as vulnerabilities in voting machines.
Election officials and cybersecurity experts have said no evidence has established that foreign intrusion or voting-machine manipulation changed the result of the 2020 election. Numerous courts, audits and Trump’s first-term Justice Department also found no evidence supporting his claims of widespread fraud.
The speech comes before the November midterms and as the administration has pushed for greater federal influence over election administration.
Why it matters: Black voting power has historically been weakened through mechanisms presented as neutral administration—poll closures, voter-roll removals, identification requirements, aggressive challenges and unequal access.
The Kin+ read: Do not merely listen for what Trump says happened in 2020. Listen for what he says should be done in 2026.
The speech is the message.
The policy being prepared behind the message may be the real story.
The FCC Could Let One Television Owner Reach More of the Country
The Federal Communications Commission is scheduled to vote August 6 on a proposal to eliminate the national television-ownership cap that generally prevents one station owner from reaching more than 39% of U.S. television households.
FCC Chair Brendan Carr argues the cap is outdated because traditional broadcasters now compete with national streaming and technology platforms. His proposal would instead permit transactions exceeding the limit through case-by-case review.
Commissioner Anna Gomez and public-interest advocates argue the move could accelerate consolidation, weaken competition and reduce local viewpoint diversity. Critics also contend that Congress—not the FCC—set the cap and must change it.
Why Kin Nation should care: Ownership determines whose newsroom survives, whose advertising revenue stays local and whose editorial priorities dominate the public airwaves.
The Kin+ read: Streaming changed the market.
That does not mean the answer is allowing the largest broadcast corporations to own more of what remains.
A media system with fewer owners may be more efficient for the corporation.
It is not automatically healthier for democracy—or for Black, local and independent media.
Ohio’s Haitian Community Faces a July 24 Work-Permit Deadline
Federal guidance temporarily extended employment authorization for Haitian Temporary Protected Status beneficiaries through July 24 while litigation over the program continues.
TPS allows eligible people from countries facing war, disaster or extraordinary instability to live and work legally in the United States. The Supreme Court recently allowed the administration to move forward with ending protections for Haitian and Syrian beneficiaries while legal challenges proceed.
The deadline has direct consequences for Ohio, particularly Springfield, where Haitian workers have become part of the local manufacturing, service, housing, school and church infrastructure.
Why Kin Nation should care: A federal document determines whether thousands of people may continue earning wages, paying rent and supporting their families.
Employers may lose workers.
Families may lose income.
Children may face instability.
Churches and social-service organizations may absorb another emergency.
The Kin+ read: Washington discusses TPS as immigration policy.
Ohio will experience it as payroll, housing, school enrollment and family survival.
July 24 is not an abstract legal date.
It is a cliff.
Trump Fired the Judges’ Choice for Seattle’s Top Federal Prosecutor
Federal judges in Washington’s Western District appointed former prosecutor and state judge Roger Rogoff as U.S. attorney after the office had gone years without a Senate-confirmed leader.
Less than an hour after Rogoff was sworn in, Trump removed him.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed the dismissal and criticized the judges for making the appointment without consulting the administration. Rogoff said he was considering legal action challenging the removal.
Federal law permits district judges to appoint a U.S. attorney when an interim appointment expires, but the administration argues the president retains removal authority. That conflict may now be tested in court.
Why Kin Nation should care: U.S. attorneys make decisions involving federal prosecutions, public corruption, civil rights, police misconduct and government enforcement.
The Kin+ read: The immediate fight is about one prosecutor in Seattle.
The institutional fight is about whether federal judges can fill a lawful vacancy when the White House refuses—and whether the president can erase their choice immediately.
Who controls the prosecutor controls an extraordinary amount of power.
READ THE RECORD
Todd Blanche Said the $1.8 Billion Fund Was Dead. The Legal Settlement Was Not.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faced approximately five hours of questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee as he sought permanent confirmation to lead the Justice Department.
Blanche previously served as Trump’s personal criminal-defense attorney.
Here is what the hearing record established:
The proposed compensation fund
The Justice Department had agreed to a settlement framework involving a roughly $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund intended to compensate Trump allies who claimed they had been improperly targeted by the government.
Blanche told senators the fund was dead and would not move forward.
But he acknowledged that the underlying settlement had not been formally rescinded.
That distinction matters.
A political promise that something will not happen is not the same as a binding legal document preventing it from happening.
The tax protections
The settlement also included protections limiting tax audits of Trump and his family businesses over prior conduct.
A federal judge criticized the arrangement and referred lawyers involved—including Blanche—to state bar authorities for possible ethics review.
The “yes man” question
Blanche told senators he was not a “yes man” and said providing counsel to the president did not mean automatic agreement.
He also defended the president’s constitutional pardon authority, including pardons connected to the January 6 attack.
The Epstein records
Blanche accepted responsibility for mistakes in the Justice Department’s release of Epstein-related records, including failures that exposed some victims’ identities.
He said the department would investigate and prosecute anyone if new evidence supported criminal charges, but he did not commit to personally meeting with victims.
The receipt
The institutional question is larger than whether Blanche performed well at a hearing.
The attorney general supervises:
Federal prosecutors.
The FBI.
Civil-rights enforcement.
Voting-rights litigation.
Police misconduct investigations.
National-security prosecutions.
Public-corruption cases.
Legal positions taken on behalf of the United States.
Blanche’s former client is now the president who appointed him.
The Senate’s job is to determine whether Blanche can distinguish between protecting Donald Trump and protecting the United States.
His assurances matter.
The unresolved settlement, tax protections and record of departmental decision-making matter more.
PULL UP TO THE COOKOUT
Columbus says its cameras help solve crimes.
The audit says the system was searched approximately 15,000 times for immigration-related purposes.
What would real accountability look like before the city keeps using the network?
A public map?
A warrant requirement?
A ban on civil immigration searches?
Quarterly audits?
Automatic termination after misuse?
Pull up and tell us where the line should be.
KEEP THE HOUSE INDEPENDENT
Kin+ is building Black Columbus’s independent newsroom for money, power, ownership, and accountability.